.: bio

 

 .: our blogs

 

 .: links
 Jimmy Gillman

Published - Tuesday, January 22, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (15 comment(s))

Will 2008 be better or worse?

.
Personally, I’m mixed on whether or not 2008 will prove to be better or worse than 2007. On the plus side, 2008 should guarantee the end of the disastrous Bush era, a time of division, severe partisanship and insecurity made worse by the frequent fear-mongering of Cheney and the leftover neocons, who have managed to isolate the United States from many of its longtime friends.

On the other hand, depending who ends up winning the November election, 2008 could become the beginning salvo in another disheartening run of government. And there’s little to believe that 2008 will bring about a more effective Congress, especially when one considers that its current leaders will still be in charge.

There’s also the possibility of a recession, or at least a real slowdown in the economy, which might make some of us with 401(k) plan accounts long for portions of 2007. And 2008 will also present the real possibility of a return to Soviet style belligerence as Vladimir Putin moves Russia further away from the democratic reforms of his predecessors.

Not surprisingly, despite the many dangers most Americans, owing in part to the inherent optimism of the human spirit, think 2008 will be an improvement over last year, though the percentages vary according to some not so surprising parameters.

Where do you come down on the question?

For a look at how other Americans feel about it, follow the link below.

Click here for more.
.
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

To 12:17 pm poster wrote on Feb 3, 2008 10:08 AM:

" And for every Ted Kennedy we would lose, we would also lose a Jessie Helms. "

Michael Welch: Fight "The System"!?... wrote on Jan 28, 2008 12:17 PM:

" Term limits would leave the congress bereft of a history; and for every legislator you don't like (Ted Kennedy say) you might lose one you do (Ted Stevens?). The 'job' of course can't be 'done' in two terms because one is simply just voting and/or working up to legislation that is more than say regulating train whistles in the night. The constitution is CONSERVATIVE after all; it requires a slow process of CHECK and BALANCE -- heard those 'terms' before? Some folks (see below) want 'the man on horseback' to clean up the Augean stable but after eight years Reagan (supposed to be 'that man') left a government LARGER than he found it! That's not an accident; that's the system... "

Gunny wrote on Jan 25, 2008 5:55 PM:

" I may be wrong, but I ran my own business for over 20 years and I know that most of the people in DC would have been fired by me for the type of work that they do. I do not feel they do enough work to be paid by the hour and for what they do minimum wage would be too much. I don't think there is a single one in congress that could make it in the real world working for a living. Any real boss that has to rely on his employees to keep his business going would fire them all in a minute. "

Gunny wrote on Jan 25, 2008 5:50 PM:

" It is time to stop giving the politicians all the breaks and letting them write the laws that only protect them and how much money they can pull in.
For as much money as they make a year, there are many of us out here that could live very well on even half of that. Term limits are needed and any pay raise for anyone in office should have to be put up for a vote by the people. They would only get a raise if they were doing their job of helping solve the real problems such as health care, education, war, taxes and a lot of other things. "

Gunny wrote on Jan 25, 2008 5:47 PM:

" I would like to see term limits voted in just as the President can not serve more than 2 terms. We do not need career congressman. 2 terms and then back to a real job. The retirement should also have to be paying into Social Security and that is what they would get when they get old enough. I can guarentee that the SS problem would be fixed real fast if that was the case.
There should also be no limit on paying SS as to what you make. You should have to pay it on all your pay even above the $90,000 or so limit. This would help fix the SS problem in a short time. If someone making 5 to 30 million had to pay SS on all of it, it would put a lot more into the bank. "

Michael Welch: "Left" Behind... wrote on Jan 23, 2008 10:46 AM:

" What struck me in the brief exchange below is the odd designation of Jimmy G as 'far left' -- that rather underscores what 'Bugs' brought up recently, namely the Noam Chomsky observation that a media with a 'liberal bias' is absolutely necessary because first: it shields conservatives from the recognition of the extent of their political control and therefore culpabilities in the present mess; and second: it marks the 'acceptable' extent of the uh 'left,' beyond which is 'FAR left' -- even someone as mildly liberal as Jimmy. That leaves socialists for instance so completely marginalized as to no longer really 'exist.' In 1960 for example EVERY 'liberal' was at least as liberal as Jim -- now Teddy Kennedy is almost an 'extremist'... "

To 2:03: wrote on Jan 23, 2008 10:07 AM:

" Yeah, those that deify Ol' Dutch conveniently forget that he not only single-handedly MADE Hezbollah with his inglorious retreat, but he doubled down on Jimmy Carter's construction of the mujahdeen, later to become the Taliban. "

Will 2008 be better or worse? wrote on Jan 23, 2008 8:14 AM:

" Worse. Not only does Bush get another 12 months to finish off his disasterous reign, but his Conservative Movement allies stand prepared to rachet up the swiftboating of whomever the opposition party puts up. It will be an ugly, divisive year where folks like Stevered and Yo realize, entirely on their own, of course, that all the horror of the past eight years was Bill Clinton's fault and the Brave Lonesome Soldier, Li'l W, fought nobly to reverse that legacy. "

Angry Ernie wrote on Jan 23, 2008 8:01 AM:

" I say we suspend the Constitution and make George Bush president for life. "

BrianGSmith wrote on Jan 23, 2008 2:03 AM:

" "Stevered" is delusional thinking Iran will attack 300 nuke-bomb posessing Israel if a "democrat" is elected. It's this type of absolute hysteria that has been the hallmark of the Bush years. What does "Stevered" have to say about Reagan pulling out of Beirut after we lost 240 US Marines in 1983? Or what about Ray-gun selling ARMS TO IRAN? The stupid partisan arguments ring absolutely hollow when stacked up against reality. Go peddle your miserable and false fantasies somewhere else "Stevered". Ridding the Nation of incompetent leadership will be our best medicine.....2009 will be a huge party. - BrianGSmith "

Yo wrote on Jan 22, 2008 6:37 PM:

" Change, we need change, we need a change like wage & price controls, we need change like Al-Quaida attacking us as they did under Bill Clinton's term. We need change like 5% unemployment is normal, not phenominaly low(under Bill). We need change like higher Food and Gas Prices because we are using food to power our energy needs....Consensus of opinion gets you:Rwanda, The Balkins, UN oil for food scandals etc. Jimmy, we need all of the above like a hole in the head. We need real leadership like this President has given, without regards in attempting to "make a legacy" like the guy who held office before him. Freedom, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness for all, not the select few of us called Americans. "

Stevered wrote on Jan 22, 2008 12:46 PM:

" Is there a blog writer at the Tribune who is not a total liberal? I enjoy many of Jimmy's movie reviews, but his far left bias on this blog should have a conservative counterpart. I am thankful for Bush's policy on terrorism and I support our effort to bring peace to Iraq. Had a spineless and idiotic Kerry been at the helm, we would be far worse off today in every way. I believe that Iran will attack Isreal if a democrat is elected president in '08. They know how much Democrats love diplomacy. I hope America can continue to win the war in '08. BTW, I am frequently amazed by the affluence in our society. I hope the USA will continue to rock in '08! "

Michael Welch: "Living The Dream" Via A Vote?... wrote on Jan 22, 2008 10:54 AM:

" Also like my pal 'Bugs' I expect Hillary to be the next president of the United States -- a reality that is not always uh reassuring. I voted early by mail in the Feb 5 AZ primary by the way -- for Obama, not because I 'buy' the whole 'change' bit and think Barack is 'pure' but because I finally saw Edwards as more a 'spoiler' in Hills' favor than viable anymore, and after all it was Martin Luther King Day and though BHO has a way to go to get to Martin's status (too far really -- at least I hope so for his family's sake) why not 'live the dream' momentarily with one measly vote eh?... "

Bugs Raplin wrote on Jan 22, 2008 10:44 AM:

" I don't think there's any reason to be optimistic. Hillary Clinton will be the new president with a Democratic Congress. But they won't do anything to end the occupation of Iraq. A big question remains. Who will attack Iran? Will it be Bush or is that assignment going to be handed to Hillary? I can hear the media pundits now blathering on how she's proved her toughness. The economy is a definite biggie that everyone ought to be worried about. Looks pretty bleak to Bugs. But then my philosophy has always been: enjoy today because tomorrow it's going to be a little bit worse. "

Michael Welch: "Fasten Your Seat Belts --"... wrote on Jan 22, 2008 10:33 AM:

" Right now the economic powers appear rather hyper-distressed about the possible (probable now?) recession after the hari-kari act in the Asian markets the past few days. The Federal Reserve has jumped up to knock down interest rates even before Wall St's opening bell today. The candydandydates are mouthing off -- Hills pilloring Obama; Obama bopping back; McCain in Florida tiresomely denouncing for the one hundred millionth time in recent American political history the 'terrible threat' of Castroite Cuba (OH-HUM!!!). 2008 will be a rocky year I'd say -- and re: Bette Davis in 'All About Eve': 'It's gon-na be a bump-y ride' nes pas?... "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of theRiver Valley Blogs.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

We will not post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.

 

 

Copyright © RVNG Publications | RVNG is a division of Lee Enterprises