.: bio

 

 .: our blogs

 

 .: links
 Cops & Courts

Published - Monday, April 07, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (10 comment(s))

Students back at it

.
La Crosse’s first Spring-like weekend brought out everyone from gardeners to bikers looking to ease serious cases of cabin fever after an unusually long, cold and snowy winter.

The warm weekend also brought out the city’s college students looking to party, if the spike in public intoxication warnings is any indication.

According to police:

University of Wisconsin-La Crosse student Brian Phillips, 18, of La Crosse, was found by police reserves walking south along the Mississippi River near the Eagle statue about 12:30 a.m. Saturday. He told police he wanted to look at the river before heading back to campus. When asked where campus was, Phillips pointed south toward the Logistics Health buildings. He also told police he was 20 years old, that his name was “Brian Chuck Thomas” and gave birthdates ranging from July 1978 to July 1998. Phillips was given a public intoxication warning, a $222 underage drinking ticket, a $70.80 ticket for being in the park after hours and a $96 ticket for lying to police.

About three hours later, police headed over to the Third and Jay parking ramp after a caller reported a problem with a drunken man. There they found 21-year-old Matthew Mueller, of La Crosse. Mueller claimed he was “A man of the law,” but showed police his driver’s license when they asked for his badge. During his conversation with police, Mueller said he was leaning against a black Dodge Avenger. The car was actually a green four-door Pontiac. He registered a 0.21 percent preliminary breath test.

Early Sunday, police reserves patrolling Riverside Park found UW-L student Kyle Kendall, 21, of Boscobel, Wis. He told police the date was Thursday, April 18 and didn’t know where he was, his address or his phone number. Kendall was transported to Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center for detoxification after registering a 0.27 percent preliminary breath test. He was also handed a public intoxication warning.
.
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Former Resident wrote on Apr 19, 2008 9:09 AM:

" LaCrosse has and always will be a police state or city if you will. I was just curios about this poblic drunk thing. So If you sitting in your yard sucking up a few cold ones and decide to take a little nap will you be waken by a cop telling you to blow here and lets go to the hospital. If you sitting on a sand bar along the beautiful mississippi sucking up a few cold ones can you get a ticket there too. Simply floors me as to the power you people have given the city police dept. I just wonder where a person can go and enjoy a good drunk. I just don't get why a person can't go to a bar get drunk and walk home. Guess that is why I don't live there any more. "

Sad wrote on Apr 12, 2008 10:08 AM:

" Well, it appears that the "serial killer" is what we always thought it was: Alcohol. Kudos to the LaCrosse police and volunteers who probably have saved some lives. A thought: Though I'm against smoking and second-hand smoke, why is that topic a bigger issue than drinking? As for non-smoking bars, won't that just send more people who are intoxicated outside? "

No FreeLunch wrote on Apr 12, 2008 9:12 AM:

" Are you people serious? Would you still be parroting the same old tired line about LacRosse being a police state if these kids died? No, then it would be "where are the cops?". Or what if they trampled your prize roses or kept you up after 9pm with their loud partying then what? The ordinances aren't the problem. The bars aren't the problem. The kids who haven't been taught any personal responsibility are the problem. "

HonestAbe wrote on Apr 8, 2008 3:51 PM:

" Outlaw alcohol, problem solved.

In reality, , , I do believe its these energy drink mixers people are drinking that don't or won't allow them to pass-out.

Used to be, if someone passed out, the bartender called 'em a cab. Now, their brain is gone, but the body is too charged to pass out, indicating the end of the night, time to eat something and crash.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8901-energy-drink-mixers-give-a-false-sense-of-sobriety.html "

EdHead wrote on Apr 8, 2008 9:42 AM:

" So, in the one case where they didn't pile on charges or take someone to detox, what did they do? Did they send a guy home who couldn't tell what color the car he was leaning on was? Granted, that's a whole other problem, but this ordinance is RIPE with problems.

So, if there is a gap, why were there other charges for the first guy. If there's a gap, why "warn" a guy who's being taken to detox. Seems to me, the police had plenty of options for those two individuals. Not to mention that the 2nd guy probably should have been taken to detox. "

To EdHead wrote on Apr 7, 2008 6:10 PM:

" The "Gap" is for the 21 yr old who didn't get anything but a public intox warning. "

EdHead wrote on Apr 7, 2008 3:29 PM:

" How many times has the Tribune reported that their was a "gap" in the law prior to the public intox ordinance? If there was a gap, why do they continue to pile charges on top of the public intox citation ["warning"]? It doesn't appear as thought the police have any problem finding things to charge these people with...or taking them to detox. So...where's the gap? "

ACLU wrote on Apr 7, 2008 12:51 PM:

" Weren't these people merely practicing an alternative lifestyle that we must try to be more tolerant of? In 30 years we will look back in horror and wonder how we could have been so bigoted against people like this. We must stop imposing our religious views on others and put an end to legislating personal morality. Otherwise, we are in danger of becoming a Christian theocracy. "

Herman the German wrote on Apr 7, 2008 12:40 PM:

" "This is a free country. You are free to do what we tell you to do." Signed, your Government. "

Heil! wrote on Apr 7, 2008 12:07 PM:

" First they came for people who use marijuana. I didn't speak up because I don't use marijuana. Then they came for people who don't wear their seatbelt. I didn't speak up because I always buckle up. Then they came for the business owners who allow smoking. I didn't speak up because I don't own a business. Then they came for the 18-20 year old adults who consume alcoholic beverages. I didn't speak up because I am 21. Will anyone be left to speak up when they decide to come for me? "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of theRiver Valley Blogs.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

We will not post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.

 

 

Copyright © RVNG Publications | RVNG is a division of Lee Enterprises