.: bio

 

 .: our blogs

 

 .: links
 Reid Magney
Published - Friday, May 16, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (12 comment(s))

County Board Beer Tax Gender Bias?

.
Thursday, the La Crosse County Board debated whether to recommend the state of Wisconsin raise taxes on alcohol and use the increased revenue to offset alcohol-related health and law enforcement expenses.

Opponents argued there's no guarantee the state would use extra tax money for alcohol treatment and education, and Wisconsin overall has some of the highest taxes in the country.

"I represent La Crosse County on the Mayor's Alcohol Oversight Committee and I just can't support this," said Supervisor Jerry Sebranek. "You're going about this backwards. Might as well just go to prohibition. What more can you do to the people that depend on businesses that dispense alcohol? ... They go under entrapment, they're scrutinized every day, people are in there checking on them and it's a game of tag, trying to catch them doing something wrong. You're going about this backwards, what you've got to do is go to the people that have the problem and you've gotta educate them before they become alcoholics and abuse this stuff. It's just all wrong."

Supporters argued each Wisconsin resident pays $1.82 in beer taxes a year, compared to $18 in alcohol treatment costs, $154 in alcohol-related health care costs and $500 in alcohol-related criminal justice and societal costs. Wisconsin has the third-lowest beer tax in the country.

"As you see by all the statistics we do have an issue in this state and in this county with alcohol," said Supervisor Jill Billings. "It costs money to educate people. I liked Supervisor Sebranek's idea to educate people. But that costs money. Providing treatment to people costs money. This is a way that I can think of that we tax the people who use the alcohol and that helps to pay for the price of being a county and a state that has such a drinking culture. We see it in our human services, we see it in children's protective services, we saw the statistics about drinking and domestic violence. We pay for it in economic support where people who have alcohol issues have a harder time keeping jobs."

The final vote was 17-13 in favor of the resolution. Notice anything about how they voted?

Yes: Sharon Hampson, Margaret Wood, Jill Billings, Maureen Freedland, Tom Rauk, Joe Veenstra, Bridget Flood, Beverly Mach, Dennis Manthei, Tammy Gamroth, Marilyn Pedretti, Vicki Burke, Jim Berns, Steve Doyle, Ann Fisher, Audrey Kader and Bill Brockmiller.

No: Roger Plesha, Ralph Geary, Gerald Sebranek, Leon Pfaff, John Medinger, Robert Keil, Ray Ebert, Robert Erickson, Arlene Benrud, Donald Meyer, Donald Bina, Charles Spiker and Brad Pfaff.

Absent: Tara Johnson, Joe Bilskemper, Andrea Richmond, Jeff Schroeder, Jai Johnson.

Men voted against the alcohol tax by a 2-to-1 margin. Women voted for the alcohol tax by an 11-to-1 margin. The men and women who voted for the tax tend to be liberals. But those against it are from all over the political spectrum.
.
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

AlexM wrote on Aug 16, 2008 7:11 PM:

" Your blog is interesting!

Keep up the good work! "

simpleman wrote on Jun 19, 2008 3:08 AM:

" Apparently "Really" cannot read. Reid made the accurate points that men tended to vote against this AND that "those against it are from all over the political spectrum". This includes John Medinger whom I have never considered conservative. He might have found fault with the proposal and voted no. I expect John will have to explain his vote to me later since I live in his district. It should be a rather interesting conversation. "

mhjsh wrote on Jun 13, 2008 9:36 AM:

" Hello, how are you?
What is your name? "

Clirgymmin wrote on May 26, 2008 7:53 PM:

" I mean Age of Conan, of course ) "

Froto wrote on May 19, 2008 9:44 AM:

" Just another way to increase taxes. They think the public is too stupid to see through it. "

Mike wrote on May 19, 2008 6:50 AM:

" I like to think of myself as an independent thinker, and I try to avoid simplistic solutions, be they of the right ("Fair Tax") or of the left ("Single Payer Plan"). This tax proposal is one of those simplistic solutions. The problem is not drinking, the problem is a culture that allows and even enables abusive drinking that causes serious health problems and death and injury to innocent bystanders through drunk driving. We need to figure out how to create a culture that frowns on it, not laughs at it. This tax won't do it. "

Reid Magney wrote on May 18, 2008 5:51 PM:

" When did I say John Medinger is a conservative? I said those who voted against it are from all over the political spectrum, which includes liberal Democrats like John. "

Observer wrote on May 18, 2008 6:43 AM:

" Interesting how many controversial votes Tara Johnson is avoiding now that she's running a campaign. What a crock. The classic "Obama bob and weave" ploy. She sould vote present and at least get credit for something. "

Garsh . . . wrote on May 17, 2008 8:39 AM:

" I'm a wee bit confused. Is this article about analyzing a beer tax gender bias,or whether men vs. women are more conservative v. liberal respectively, or what? If we're going to include anything so eye-catching as "gender bias" in an article, can we get a direct relationship with the title instead of a passing glance? It kind of seems like we have an author casually throwing up his hands, looking down at the floor and remarking "I'm just sayin . . ." "

P.S. wrote on May 17, 2008 12:04 AM:

" Reid, honestly why don't you just admit already your truly a liberal Democrat at heart? At least be honest with your readers for once! "

Really wrote on May 17, 2008 12:02 AM:

" So John Medinger is a conservative now according to you? I think I'll be reporting you Mr. Magney to the Government Accountability Board and the Wisconsin Newspaper Association! I've had enough of your one sided slant! "

That must have been a hard vote for JM wrote on May 16, 2008 8:04 PM:

" Usually he will take the gals point of view. But he must not of liked the idea of spending an extra nickel per beer! "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of theRiver Valley Blogs.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

We will not post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.

 

 

Copyright © RVNG Publications | RVNG is a division of Lee Enterprises