.: bio

 

 .: our blogs

 

 .: links
 Up on the wrong side of the bed.

Published - Thursday, June 19, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (4 comment(s))

After 55 years -- congratulations are in order

.
I just checked. The sky hasn't fallen yet even though California is issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples.

They sign in as Party A and Party B rather than bride and groom -- just in case you were wondering.

The first couple to tie the knot were, appropriately enough, a San Fransisco couple, Del Martin, and Phyllis Lyon, Del is 87, Phyllis is 84. They've been together 55 years.

Talk about long engagements...

At least they were married in time to have the legal right to make funeral arrangements for each other. The legal right to be there when the other dies.

Fundamentally, that's what this is all about -- legal rights enforced by a contract that they have been allowed to enter into.

A contract -- not a sacrament. Theirs is a union sanctioned by the state, not necessarily a church. It is an act of man, not of God.

Which is how it should be. Civil law is gender blind. The ability to fulfill the civil contractual obligations, rights and responsibilities imposed by the legalities of marriage is no more a matter of genitalia than it is skin color, caste, class or ethnic background -- though those factors too have been upheld as legal impediments to matrimony. This is an issue of equality before the law -- civil law -- not canon law, not sharia, not the laws of Moses nor Levitical injunctions.

And as such, it is good law.

Not God's law -- just good.
.
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Formerwinonan wrote on Jun 24, 2008 12:20 PM:

" Wow, with a name like "Unfortunately"-- clearly it is your job, as a blogger, to play the role of Debbie Downer or Bad News Bob.
Hang in there. I'm sure this is a subject that will not be forgotten or gone by the wayside. "

Unfortunately wrote on Jun 20, 2008 3:14 PM:

" we won't know the "outcome" of this for about six or seven years. And guys like Jerome will completely ignore the results if it found out that this was not a good idea. "

Troller wrote on Jun 20, 2008 8:35 AM:

" Yes, you have hit the nail on the head Jerome. I have no problems with people doing what they please consensually. These rights should not have to be "granted" they should be "a given". I imagine these people now have great appreciation for their new rights. Too bad the same folks who are basking in golden showers over this natural birthright can't muster the same feelings about some of the rights we currently have which the "STATE" would like to take away. This is my problem. When we have the "state" sanction basic rights, then the state can remove basic rights. You posted, "sanctioned by the state" and this crosses party lines. Have we just opened the door for them? "

Craig wrote on Jun 19, 2008 6:16 AM:

" Short and to the point on a very important and controversial issue.
Well said Jerome. Thank you! "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of theRiver Valley Blogs.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

We will not post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.

 

 

Copyright © RVNG Publications | RVNG is a division of Lee Enterprises