.: bio

 

 .: our blogs

 

 .: links
 Letters from the editor

Published - Friday, November 14, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (4 comment(s))

Winona's Potemkin

.
To the editor:

Why didn't someone think of this?

Why didn't someone sell this on eBay, especially when the county is spending so much to remove it?

There are a lot of bored, rich people in this world that are not sure what they plan to buy next. I could give some examples, but I think we know where this is going.

If we go back and do our history, our country received one of the greatest landmarks in America as a gift -- the Statue of Liberty.

The Wilkie was a gift to us. It was our Statue of Liberty.

[anonymous reader]

Dear Reader:

Let's set aside for a moment the Wilkie is on public property (the Levee is owned by the city and its a federal Army Corps of Engineers site).

I am not sure who would have wanted to spend the money to save the Wilkie, especially if they were somewhere else other than Winona. Not all the Bloedow cookies in the world could save it. I am guessing its because Winona, a town that is in love with its own history and recognizes history, understood that a 27-year-old look-a-like, wasn't really historic. It wasn't even old.

Granted, there were people leading the charge to save it. The truth is they cared deeply, but just couldn't arouse sentiment where there was little to none.

The Statue of Liberty is an interesting comparison, but there's a very important distinction. The Statue of Liberty doesn't just commemorate the past, or what was. The Statue still has as much meaning today as when it was given to us. It stands for liberty, equality and promise of America -- ideas that aren't specific to any particular period in our history; ideas that are still as fresh today as they were in 1886.

The Wilkie, meanwhile, just calls attention to a very specific time in our history. It had a hard time really speaking to the present or future, especially when the structure itself was void of any true historic significance. In a bit harsher terms, it was mirage, a Winonan Potemkin Village.

Maybe even those who gave such lipservice to the Wilkie's importance at the base of Main might have privately conceded a boat that couldn't float wasn't really very true to the river.

Maybe we should have just left the pile of wood and debris there. That would have been the most honest use of the space. After all, a pile of rubble is just what it seems -- pieces of wood, plaster and glass. Instead, the Wilkie was never as it seemed -- meant to look like a boat, drawing curious gawkers, but then never quite living up to tourists' expectations or ours.
.
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

gary wrote on Nov 20, 2008 12:55 PM:

" For only $60./hr we could get Winona teachers to math tutor the various idiots downtown that have so many ways of blowing our money. Let's start with the board that bound and determined to put up windmills, inspite of the evidence against it being profitable. "

HiwayMan wrote on Aug 17, 2008 7:35 PM:

" finally, Winona got rid of that ridiculous boat. Now, like many similar small cities, Winona can be characterized by a bleak downtown, and a string of chain stores along a highway. "Ah, look honey, ShopKo, Wal-Mart and McDonald's, it's good to be home." "

Bankrobber wrote on Jul 20, 2008 6:57 AM:

" The Wilkie saga offers a number of lessons.

1.) The City and the Chamber did not live up to their respective responsibilities by allow it to be
a. Shoddily built, in the first place, by a deceptive contractor.
b. Remain unkempt, without appropriate oversight and contracting with a very shady person to maintain it.

2.) Considering the above failures, what in the world would make any sane person believe any City or Chamber plan would be better conceived or cared for, ever?

3.) This is not the first time the City has screwed up. Recall the excursion boat and the $250,000 that floated down with it?

But, as long as citizens sit on their hands and do nothing, they will continue to get what they put into their city - nothing! "

Troller wrote on Jul 16, 2008 6:46 AM:

" Perhaps you missed the point. If someone had offered $1 for the salvage, the city would have been ahead of the game. As for the Statue of Liberty, any symbol is only as good as the meaning it is given by those who possess it. But I guess if it must float, represent the river, then let's put a canoe up there. Around 1658, Pierre Radisson and countless Native Americans traveled the Mississippi in canoes. It's historically correct and next time Winona decides to tear down a monument, you can hire some kid to portage it away for $20. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of theRiver Valley Blogs.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

We will not post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.

 

 

Copyright © RVNG Publications | RVNG is a division of Lee Enterprises