River Valley Blogs

The Emperor of Ice Cream wrote on Nov 26, 2008 2:55 PM:

" And on that note, we will simply have to disagree and leave it at that. At any rate, Happy Thanksgiving to you. "

Davidinlse wrote on Nov 26, 2008 12:56 PM:

" RE; The Emperor of Ice Cream wrote on Nov 26, 2008 11:07 AM: Ignoring ignorance is not shielding myself from the truth. You are dismissed as you have said nothing of value. "

The Emperor of Ice Cream wrote on Nov 26, 2008 11:07 AM:

" Davidinlse, if you look at your original post, you act as if shielding yourself from the truth will just make it go away. That is why I considered your comment anti-intellectual, and why it appears you arent teachable. "

Michael Welch Barack Obama As Ronald Reagan Jr... wrote on Nov 26, 2008 10:41 AM:

" If Obama is actually FOR same sex marriage and I've missed that then I commend him! And I shall look forward to especially his federal judicial appointments. However the O is I think far too savvy a politico to complicate his 'running start' with any real effort to galvanize backing for a federal law or a constitutional amendment; that just cannot happen at this time. Obama will be more like Ronald Reagan 'in reverse,' i. e., just as RR mouthed the 'right' words re: abortion et. al., he DID very little about those things apropos having been the 'Kaleefornya' (as it is NOW pronounced eh) gov who signed into law the MOST LIBERAL ABORTION RIGHTS BILL up to that time, the late '60s... "

Davidinlse wrote on Nov 26, 2008 9:51 AM:

" RE: The Emperor of Ice cream wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:46 AM: No I will not admit that. Quite the opposite. I feel that anyone who knowingly financially supports people that you feel are dishonest, or support those who finance them, you are being dishonest to yourself. In short, it is you who have a serious problem with reality and have again demonstrated your own anti-intelligence stance. You have also demonstrated again why the right wingers failed in the last election, and why people have only contempt for thier spokespersons. "

Cagefighter to BrianGSmith wrote on Nov 26, 2008 9:17 AM:

" Wow. Either you have developed the best sense of humor I have ever seen literally overnight, or you really are THAT clueless. Re your commentary regarding Hannity: You DO realize how ironic that is, dont you? "

The Emperor of Ice cream wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:46 AM:

" Also, Mr Davidinlse, will you admit your comment was anti-intellectual? Andy K, will you admit it? The kook that is stalking Ronnie, will you admit it? Or, am I the last honest man posting? "

The Emperor of Ice cream wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:43 AM:

" Good call. That was obviously a grammatical goof on my part-even a little anti intellectual if you will. I admit it. Will you do the same regarding your post, Mr Starfish? "

To Jimmy Got it Wrong wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:38 AM:

" Whatever your beef is with Ronnie, just let it go man! Take a deep breath, relax, and release all your pent up frustration. I promise, you will feel much better and happier. By the way, didnt your mom say the chores had to be finished before you use the computer? "

jeff wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:30 AM:

" Hey Neil, the word "your" implies ownership. The word "you're" means "you are". "

To liberal defined wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:03 AM:

" I think you hit the nail right on the head. Great answer! "

Without Rush and Hannity wrote on Nov 26, 2008 5:11 AM:

" there's NOBODY in the major media who will tell us what the libs in government are up to until after it's all been done to us. "

Yup wrote on Nov 26, 2008 5:07 AM:

" There's nobody more loving and tolerant than libs- as long as you agree with everything they think. Just reading the liberal posts here shows more vitriol than you hear on Rush and Hannity. "

BrianGSmith wrote on Nov 26, 2008 2:54 AM:

" Rush...Hannity...O'Reilly are 'insufficient' as real men in our Society, they come up short, thus their bitter and whiny outlook on life.

Hannity is the chubby spoiled rich kid in the neighborhood who runs blabbering home to Daddy everytime he gets depantsed on the playground.

Rush has to take hillbilly heroine to escape his effeminate existence in our uber-tough guy Society and use erectile enhancing drugs of other men to have some sense of accomplishment.

Throw those clowns out of their emerald studios and into the real world and they and their infantile and petulant ideas would get torn to shreds in minutes. "

More Food for Thought wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:53 PM:

" Now the other definition: conservative (kn-srv-tv)
adj.
1. Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.
2. Traditional or restrained in style

You people are neither. What you are comparing are fascists and communists. Your extreme views rival that of the islamic terrorists we are supposed to be at war with (not each other!) "

Food for Thought wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:47 PM:

" Here is a dictionary definition of liberal for those of you not really aware of the difference between a liberal and a conservative.
liberal (lbr-l, lbrl)
adj.
1.
a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. "

What kind of Liberals are you wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:26 PM:

" My, my aren't we intolerant to alternative views. Thank God our liberal forefathers weren't that way, or there would be no first amendment rights. (note that it was an amendment, not part of the original document). Funny how people that call themselves liberals are no different in their tact than intolerant conservatives. "

Jimmy got it wrong wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:38 PM:

" Ann Coulter is the wicked witch of the west with the big Adams apple. Rush Limbaugh is the serial liar. I wish I would have thought of that before so I could have explained it that way to "my tormentor Ronnie". You know, the guy that doesn't believe that Rush lies everyday on his show. And yet, he won't listen to it and report back on his findings because he feels "thats my problem" to prove. I keep telling him that all he has to do is listen to hear the truth but he would rather spin wheels on another blog. I don't think people like "Ronnie" want the truth and that's why I consider people like him intellectually dishonest. "

To happymom wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:29 PM:

" I regularly read your posts and I must say you never sound very happy. By the way, there are no conservative commentators that I like. Can you be serious for a moment and tell us one liberal one that you like? (please exclude Jimmy). "

liberal defined wrote on Nov 25, 2008 8:59 PM:

" Teddy Kennedy called himself a liberal and he was proud of it. He was very public and vocal about it, so I believe that alot of the common understanding of what a liberal is, is based on what Teddy Kennedy was and stood for. Once people accepted that understanding of what a liberal was, then the definition of a conservative was someone who stood for things that Teddy Kennedy was against. I know this is ancedotal, but it is one of the reasons that our definitions of conservative and liberal vary from what Websters says it is. "

To Neil from Jimmy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 7:05 PM:

" Ouch, Neil! Not any any time soon, I'm afraid. But thanks for reading my blog. (Don't worry, I won't tell anyone you did, it'll be our little secret.) "

neil h wrote on Nov 25, 2008 6:11 PM:

" Too bad your not leaving. "

The Emperor of Ice Cream wrote on Nov 25, 2008 5:26 PM:

" RE: The Emperor of Ice Cream wrote on Nov 25, 2008 1:01 PM: And you are going to "teached" me something? You clearly teached me with your very anti-intellectual comment. "

Brudos wrote on Nov 25, 2008 5:22 PM:

" At a Partner meeting just before the Election, I was surprise by all the support for John McCain. A speaker for the group even acknowledged Palin's shortcomings yet still tried to muscled up support for the Republican ticket. The main focus was on the Death Tax, and how we should advise clients depending on who won. It's strange when someone has way to much, and is unwilling to share. Not that they should, but the stubbornness of these crusty old men and women is alarming. They're only concerned is for their money. They don't care whose in office, just as long as they leave their money alone! These are smart educated people in our community and I know none of them listened to Limbaugh and Hannity to get there. "

happymom wrote on Nov 25, 2008 5:14 PM:

" Liberal commentators I like? Why, you, of course, Jimmy! "

Brudos wrote on Nov 25, 2008 5:08 PM:

" No one can actually define Conservative. It's just a warm fuzzy feeling and longing for everything to stay the same, the Status Quo, that keeps people marching to the Conservative tune. If you ask people how they dress, they say Conservative. The word Conservative is familiar to them. It's comfortable, and Liberal, after being demonized, is not. The word Liberal stands for Freedom, Free Thought, and a Free market. But Rush, Hannity and all the other Republicans have adopted that message and made it their own. If their definition of Liberal means, those who are against the majority, and those who intend to cause trouble, then they, and the Republican Party have become the Liberals. "

To Starfish wrote on Nov 25, 2008 4:50 PM:

" Yes, I am serious. Think about it. These are all what could be termed "liberal" preachers. The others are all what could be termed "conservative" preachers. He may identify more with the mindset of the conservative preachers. I know this is hard to grasp-but try wrapping your little mind around it. Just try. "

Starfish wrote on Nov 25, 2008 4:04 PM:

" To 3:17: you're serious, aren't you? Let's do a moment of raw statistics: if, as you suggest, it is just coincidence then let's calculate the odds? If blacks are 20% of the population--1 in 5 for those of you in Rio Linda; to RANDOMLY choose three from that 20% would be a less than 1% probability. Yeah, yeah: just so happens. . . And you think MY brain will hurt! My suggestion to you: next time you feel the need to blow your nose, sniffle it back. I don't think you can afford to lose anything out of there. "

Big E wrote on Nov 25, 2008 3:33 PM:

" The far right wingers are no worse than any of those on the far left. Liars? Look far to the left at the SNL alum and future senator. Air America is as full of lies as anything the pill popper has said. "

Think about it wrote on Nov 25, 2008 3:30 PM:

" Sean Hannity is so bad he makes Bill O'Reily seem like the logical person on fox. Jimmy have to agree with you on the conservative commentators you do like. All of them actually stick to their conservative principles instead of just being echo chambers for the republican party. Hannity is the worst! "

To Starfish wrote on Nov 25, 2008 3:17 PM:

" Although there is much to pick apart, I will focus on one part of your post to show how warped and paranoid the liberal mindset is. You offer as evidence of Rushs racism his vocal disapproval of 3 black preachers and contrast it with him remaining silent regarding three white preachers. Could it be......your brain may hurt after this so get ready......but, is it at all remotely possible that he objects to the ideas of one set of 3 preachers, but not the other three, REGARDLESS(gasp!) of race? I mean, could it actually be you could object to the ideas of a Black man, or 2 or 3 or 4 but NOT be a racist? Pretty radical, I know. "

Carnival Freak from Murder Creek wrote on Nov 25, 2008 3:13 PM:

" Interesting how Welch and Harsch remain completely silent regarding Harschs vileness and hate on these blogs, even when asked about it outright below.
Burning someone if effigy is obviously done regardless of race. Bush is white, and it has been done to him countless times. Obama is Black, and he is starting to feel how the pea-brained express their disagreement. Just as Bush did. "

to harsch wrote on Nov 25, 2008 3:11 PM:

" how do you think those bush effigys where stood up? I'll give you a hint, a rope noose around his neck. it is hipocritical to say one symbol is ok and the other symbol is not. your excuse is typical for liberals who define tolerance as tolerating everything accept conservative/christian views, or define free speech as only that speech which supports your cause. "

To happymom from Jimmy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 3:03 PM:

" Yes, there are many conservative commentators I like, or at least don't dislike. They include George Will, David Brooks, Kathleen Parker, Irwin Stelzer, believe it or not, on occasion Pat Buchanan and Chris Wallace, Andrew Sullivan and Rich Lowry come to mind. How about you, my friend? Any liberal opinion makers you like? (And by the way, have a nice Thanksgiving!) "

happymom wrote on Nov 25, 2008 1:59 PM:

" I regularly watch Hannity and Colmes and wonder who, if anyone will take Alan's place? I'd like to see Sean stick with his Hannity's America show on the weekend, and have the primetime slot filled by Glenn Beck, who left CNN to join FOX. Jimmy, I suppose Glenn boils your gizzards just as bad as Sean, Rush and company? Is there a conservative commentator you DO like? "

PHIL OSIFER wrote on Nov 25, 2008 1:31 PM:

" Wait til the revolution comes, we conservative will take over and fill the camps. "

The Emperor of Ice Cream wrote on Nov 25, 2008 1:01 PM:

" Davidinlse, that was a very anti-intellectual comment. That just shows that you cant be teached and will forever remain willfully ignorant. "

To Michael and Jimmy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:52 PM:

" Go to Obama's transition website (change dot gov), then click on the Agenda, button. The first topic listed is Civil Rights. Scroll down just a little and read the "Support for LGBT community".

Hopefully Jimmy allows this posting to pass through. I'm not posting any thing but facts contained in Obama's own website. "

Dear speaking about the economy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:49 PM:

" To paraphrase Iraqi war 'architect' Paul Wolfowitz......'it'll easily pay for itself'

BGS "

harsch...demagogue versus guru wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:49 PM:

" Welch is right that the three certifiable liars named above, hannity, coulter, and limbaugh, are 'entertainers', but they are believed by people incapable of thinking for themselves, people who eleveate them to the heights of demagoguery. But most vile on this post is the apparent ease with which acts that harken back to the racist days conservatives claim are gone are dismissed. When Bush is burned in effigy, he is not burned as a representative of long maligned race. As for the other tripe surfacing repeatedly, that Obama is a dictator in the making, this is the typed version of a captive smearing his feces on the wall. "

Dear Froto wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:48 PM:

" RE: Palin.....Cruel things said about her? Did you listen to what that lunatic was saying and inciting? She bet it all on Ayer's and lost...SPECTACULARLY. She's a secessionst bimbo who doesn't know her mouth from her alimentary canal.

Look out.....Putin just reared his ugly head behind you?

Just kidding....it was a CALIPHATER....

Ha...gotchya again. Jumpy you right wingers are....and overly sensitive.

BGS "

nolyow wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:47 PM:

" Andy k please read this with an open mind. Question? Have you ever had a friend that went to a movie and reported to you how great the movie was, repeated over and over how much you would like it and what a great ending it had, you just had to see it. When you finally went, you found the show good but not as great as your friend did.
Now go to McNabb, what I think Rush was saying is the media was saying how great McNabb was and causing people to expect the impossible. Even great plays turn out to be just okay. Race was just one of the reasons why people were putting him on a pedestal that anyone was doomed to fall off of.
There is always more than one way to look at any issue. "

BrianGSmith wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:43 PM:

" Hannity is one of the leading, sniveling yellow warhawk provocateurs and only preaches to fellow Kool Aid drinkers.. A whiny, bee-itchy, powder faced pillow hugger.

Thanks to mental midgets like Hannity the right wing herd has culled itself into two parts....the rational minority Eisenhower republicans and the banshee wailing and ever pouty majority 'end-of-days' apocalypters.

Hannity and pill popper Limbutt are the last dudes I'd follow if the proverbial organic matter hit the fan......and not only to avoid their quickly evacuated bodily fluids they leave behind as they run....but because they have been SPECTACULARLY WRONG their entire public careers...especially the last 7 years. "

speaking about the economy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:19 PM:

" Harry Reid told the Detroit Free Press that he expects comprehensive immigration reform to be passed relatively early in the next Congress.

So what is the cost of that?

An estimated 2,600,000,000,000 Dollars! In case that's hard to read just say 2 point 6 TRILLION Dollars!

Where is that money going to come from?

I'll give you a clue, Government will take more out of yours and my pocket to give to people who just walked across the border. Geeze, why should I bother getting up at 4:30 in the morning and humping out a 12 hour day, when I can just camp out at home and get my own gubment check. "

To Harsch wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:42 AM:

" Will you please yield and admit your libeling and disparaging our dear brother Izzy was a moral failure on your part? Then, we can put all this ugliness behind us and find the strength to move forward. "

davidinlse wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:25 AM:

" I agree Jimmy. I go one step further though. I turn off every station they are on, but periodically listen just to know what sponsors I can boycott. "

To andy k wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:17 AM:

" You have quite the convoluted logic in an attempt to prove Rush as a racist. By Rush stating his opinion that McNabb was over rated but that view wouldn't be reported by a media bias, does not mean that Rush thinks all Blacks are inferior human beings. By your convoluted logic, Andy Reid must be a racist for benching him, or Bradshaw is a racists for pointing out McNabbs idiocy on not knowing about ties in the NFL.

Rush did defend his position on air, citing McNabbs stats, and the lack of media reporting on that. Thing was that he was fired almost as soon as he made his statement, so most people never heard his side.

Maybe your new to sports commentary, but it is 99% opinion and guessing to attract viewers. Rush's view didn't attact many viewers so they cut him. End of story. "

Jeff wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:17 AM:

" You can say what you want about Rush, he is controversial, but the pill-popping comment was really below the belt. There's quite a difference between someone who becomes addicted to prescription drugs and someone who seeks out recreational drugs. I guess that makes anyone who is a drug addict a total loser? Include those who overindulge in alcohol? That's a big group of people you're pointing fingers at. "

Harsch...Everyone indeed needs a guru wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:16 AM:

" This blog has led to a possible record collection of vile nauseating typings. Why? First, though Hannity, Limbaugh, and Coulter truly are certifiable liars, they have demagogic talents, and easily persuade those who can't think for themselves. But worse, the ugliness comes from a post about racism. Burning Bush in effigy derives from long historical habit, while nooses and the like derive from a part of America's past that many of the vile here claim actually is past. I can't claim that all these bizarre importents of Obama's coming dictatorship are racist, but they ARE deranged, utterly deranged. Those who peck these things onto this luckily easily cleaned slate are genuinely psychotic. It goes beyond any sensible United States of America political debate, has nothing to do with liberal versus conservative, and it really smacks of genuine deep-seated hate. "

To Michael wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:02 AM:

" You never did answer the poster on the other blog, but I am curious how you can defend Harschs accusations against another poster?(over 40/under 15 thing). You claim he is honest and humane, yet those comments had no basis whatsoever. So, how does honest and humane work in there? "

Starfish wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:56 AM:

" To Michael Welch: President Obama will only put gay marriage up front and center AFTER he takes all our guns away. I'm not sure when he'll get around to defiling our women and burning our fields, but we can be assured that it will be soon.

These wingnuts have nothing. NOTHING! They vision and governance has failed so miserably that all they've got is name-calling and totally baseless allegations. "

Starfish wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:53 AM:

" On Limbaugh: predicating every update about Senator Carol Braun with the soundtrack from the Jefferson's "Movin' On Up." Then there is the constant singling out of black ministers--Jackson, Sharpton, Wright--while Haggard, Hague, etc. get nary a whimper. There was the ESPN Donovan McNabb episode, sending his Hispanic maid out to fetch his drugs, Viagra-tourism to the Dominican Republic where underage sex-slaves aren't as uppity as American women. Actually, it's not his racism that is most notable to me; it is his abject cowardice. Picking on a then 13 year old Chelsea Clinton. . . Brave man: truly the poster boy for all that is American Conservatism. "

Izzy Fabin to Andy K wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:52 AM:

" If that is the only arguement you have supporting the contention that Rush is a racist, it is pretty weak. Allegations of racism do not make one a racist. Think about it. If Rush is a racist simply because he accused others of racism, than you would also be a racist(for the same reason). And I would be a racist for accusing you of racism, and so on. That sounds like Harsch logic to me, and it just doesnt work. BTW, there is no such thing as "reverse racism". The term is "racism", no matter who it is for or against. "

Michael Welch Ignorance Of History Is Their Excuse... wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:33 AM:

" As for racism it certainly exists in America and has for hundreds of years but American history is a blank for the religious right commenters here; they know NOTHING about and even CARE nothing about it. They're fortunate to recall that George Washington was a president and maybe Abraham Lincoln was too but they HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE of either. There was bound to be a racist reaction to the election of a president whose father was African; racism is engrained in the very fabric of our history and has brought out a myriad of vicious violent responses as do immigration, labor rights and dissent from war. THIS history the commenters here are TOTALLY ignorant of apparently -- so much so they ought no longer be 'Republicans' really but 'Know Nothings.' However they have NEVER heard of the 'Know Nothings' have they?!... "

Michael Welch O All Those Endearing OLD Charms... wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:23 AM:

" Obama has put gay marriage on his 'main agenda'?! Okay what right wing blog does THAT come from? Obama has NEVER endorsed same sex marriage but the issue is rife with the particular strife that the religious right adores. No right wingie DARES discuss the impending economic doom -- for they CLAIM to be 'Randians' but don't know what Rand ACTUALLY believed except that they do assert her view of the 'superiority' of the rich by way of being rich. (NOT Jesus' view AT ALL by the way but who cares what HE says eh.) The greatest economic evil for the religious right is to 'redistribute.' And Coulter, Hannity, Limbaugh, O'Reilly et. al. are really just entertainers more than anything, directed at an audience that enjoys having itself confirmed and expects it -- which is why it resents Jimmy and Jimmy's blog so... "

andy k wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:14 AM:

" This is Rush's brand of 'humor'. It is aimed at angry white men who believe they are disadvantaged as compared to women and minorities. It encourages animosity on the part of his listeners toward blacks, women and anyone else who disagrees with him. The "racist" label is, indeed, ugly, but, in Rush's case, it is fair. "

andy k wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:11 AM:

" Rush gave no evidence to support his opinion about McNabb being overrated. His accusation of "reverse racism" by the mainly white sports writers was also given without supporting evidence. Rush feigned surprise and bewilderment when McNabb and others took offense at his comments. His injection of race into a discussion of football was unnecessary. His ultimate point (blacks have advantages that us abused white males don't get) was ridiculous. He didn't try very hard to defend his comments with evidence (there isn't any) and seemed to enjoy the controversy. "

Froto wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:10 AM:

" As to the Brown Shirt comment, we actually have that attitude now as I pointed out. The major difference is that if successful the Brown Shirt mantra will make all the tactics now used by liberals and their intolerance into law. "

Froto wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:09 AM:

" From the party that claims to be for individual rights, free speech, and on and on, this just proves again that all this freedom stuff from the Dems is only OK if you agree with them and only they can critizie in any form they wish. Now if you are republican or a democrate who disagrees with anything from the liberal side then anything to shut you up or destroy you in any manner possible is OK. Look at the cruel things said of Palin, and thats just a small example for which the dems/liberals found reasons why they were OK or not so bad. Let a Repub. try that and they all scream bloody murder. "

andy k wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:07 AM:

" The Donovan Mcnabb incident exposed Rush as a racist, but nobody should have been surprised by that. To summarize, Rush got a job as a talking head on ESPN, to talk about pro football. Out of the blue, during a conversation that had nothing to do with race, he expressed his opinion that McNabb was overrated as a quarterback by the media because McNabb is black and the media desperately wants to see black quarterbacks succeed. "

obama-nation wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:55 AM:

" Them foxey liars! BTW:I'm going to give you everything. "

Allen to Ronnie wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:52 AM:

" We discussed this previously, but the one and only example of Rush's racism is that he disagrees with Obama on some fundamental issues and did not support his run for President. Of course, since Obama is Black, this makes Rush a racist.
You see, for these discussions to make sense, you must wrap your brain around the liberal mindset. "

to Jimmy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:45 AM:

" It's all about priority. Saying they all are priorities is political speak that is seeking not to piss anyone off. Let's be real here. Islamic Terrorism should be number one or two, the Economy should be one or two. Dealing with nutcases like the KKK is much farther down on the list of important issues to be dealt with.

This dovetails into something I just read this morning, Obama has made homosexuality one of his main agendas for his first 100 days. This includes marriage issues and gays in the military. Obama was supposed to be something new, but this is becoming Bill Clinton all over again. "

Ronnie Gossett wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:42 AM:

" I admit that I dont listen to Rush often....actually, hardly ever. I know who he is, thats about it. Could someone enlighten an ignorant hillbilly? I get the pill-popping comment(was ALL over the news). But, I dont get the racist comment. That is a pretty strong accusation. I assume he's no Rick Harsch, but can we get SOME examples of his racism? "

To Jeff from Jimmy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:29 AM:

" I despise Coulter, Hannity and Limbaugh, and I make no apology for that. I wish none of them any harm (that would be hateful). I simply think they should take all of the money they've made promoting hate and division and simply retire, perhaps to Bolivia or some other out of the way place. "

to 921 from Jimmy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:26 AM:

" Can't argue with the overall thrust of your comment, but the larger point is that BOTH are a threat, and neither should be taken lightly. Just ask that of someone who's been a victim of the KKK. "

Cagefighter wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:21 AM:

" Wow, Jimmy. A little cranky today? Hopefully none of your co-workers cross you today. "Pill-popping racist"? Sheeesh.
The KKK acts are, of course, reprehensible. This goes back to my point that this country(even those who like to consider themselves tolerant and politically correct) are WAY too focused on Obamas race. The constant talk of "First Black President", etc, likely adds fuel to the fire of the human garbage like the KKK. Would they have still committed the acts? Probably. But, why add fuel to the fire and constantly focus on race? "

oooh 200 incidents of ropes tied into nooses wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:21 AM:

" Obama better institute martial law, cause we know the extreme danger posed by ropes tied into nooses is huge. Come on, man! I bet in San Francisco alone, Bush was hung and burned in effigy over 200 times! The KKK is at most 10,000 fat, tattooed hillbillies. They are not any kind of threat to America. Muslim terrorists number in the millions, with supporting countries that have billions of dollars and that want to destroy and inslave us. That is a threat, not the KKK. "

Jeff wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:20 AM:

" Jimmy, I usually like reading your blog but today is an exception. Your comments are just plain hateful. Are you and BGS the same person? "

Kevin wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:13 AM:

" It's a good thing we have the kinder, gentler, less vitriolic left in power now....no hate ever emanates from the likes of you lefties....you guys just kill me....If you listened to Hannity, he's hardly conniving, certainly he manipulates emotions, but then who in this business doesn't Jimmy, read below for an example? Rush, hardly a racist....

OBVIOUSLY, THE ECONOMY ISNT ALL THAT NEEDS FIXING

"... Sean Hannitys conniving, crooked conservative. Its just too bad its not the latter on his way out along with t... pill-popping racist and current radio carnival barker, Rush Limbaugh." "

not to worry jimmy wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:12 AM:

" when Obama's brown shirts institute his new 'fairness' doctrine, the only news you will hear on the controlled airways will be all Obama praise all day long balanced by blaming bush for all the ills america faces. "

Comments »

Post a comment (150 word limit) »